Rules— Part 1 Report

Suggestion: Your answer is unclear and contains grammatical errors. Try to directly answer the question with a clear topic sentence, then provide specific details about the rules, using correct grammar and linking words for coherence.

Example: Yes, there are a few rules at my school. For example, we have a dress code that requires us to wear white shirts and dark pants or skirts. Besides that, there aren't many strict rules for students.

Suggestion: Your answer is repetitive and lacks clarity. Avoid filler words and express your opinion clearly with reasons and examples. Use linking words to connect your ideas logically.

Example: I don't think having more rules would help students. In fact, strict rules can limit students' creativity and prevent them from expressing their individuality.

Suggestion: Your answer is confusing and contains grammatical mistakes. Provide a clear topic sentence, describe the teacher's dedication with specific examples, and explain your feelings using correct grammar and linking words.

Example: Yes, I have had a very dedicated teacher. She was passionate about teaching English and always prepared interesting lessons. I appreciated her effort, although sometimes I wished she gave me more challenging tasks.

Suggestion: Your answer is somewhat unclear and contains filler words. Express your preference clearly with reasons and examples, and use linking words to make your answer coherent.

Example: I prefer to have fewer rules at school because it allows students to be more creative and express themselves. This freedom makes school life more interesting and enjoyable.

Suggestion: Your answer is unclear and grammatically incorrect. Provide a clear topic sentence, explain why strict teachers can be beneficial with specific reasons, and use linking words for coherence.

Example: Yes, I have had strict teachers, and I think strictness can be helpful. It encourages students to focus and take the subject seriously, which can improve learning outcomes.

Suggestion: Your answer is repetitive and contains filler words. Express your opinion clearly with reasons and examples, and avoid unnecessary repetition to make your answer more effective.

Example: Yes, I would like to work in a school without strict rules because it allows teachers to be creative in their teaching methods. This flexibility benefits both students and teachers by making learning more engaging.

× In my school would have.

✓ In my school, there would be.

The original sentence lacks the correct 'there be' structure to indicate existence. 'There would be' correctly expresses the existence of something in the school.

× In my school we don't have any rules for students.

✓ In my school, we don't have any rules for students.

A comma after 'In my school' improves sentence clarity and flow, though the grammar is acceptable.

× It's like just for form.

✓ It's just for formality.

The phrase 'just for form' is awkward; 'just for formality' is a more natural expression to indicate something is done only as a formality.

× Our form we have to wear white, white, soft, high and dark low.

✓ In our form, we have to wear white shirts, soft shoes, high socks, and dark low pants.

The original sentence is unclear and uses adjectives incorrectly. Clarifying the items and using appropriate adjectives improves meaning and grammar.

× Do you think students would benefit more from more rules?

✓ Do you think students would benefit more from more rules?

No correction needed; the modal verb 'would' is used correctly here.

× It's stupid because, uh, in our school we have stupid rules and uh, these rules, it's uh, don't let peoples, uh, make themselves, uh, something, uh, interesting something, uh, that, uh, different of others.

✓ It's stupid because, in our school, we have stupid rules, and these rules don't let people make themselves something interesting, something different from others.

'Peoples' is incorrect; the correct plural is 'people'. Also, 'it's' should be 'these rules don't'. The phrase 'different of others' should be 'different from others'. These corrections fix pronoun and preposition errors.

× Yeah, I have. Yeah, I had really good teacher.

✓ Yeah, I have. Yeah, I had a really good teacher.

The article 'a' is missing before 'really good teacher'. This is an article error but also relates to sentence structure.

× She was so dedicated with her work.

✓ She was so dedicated to her work.

The correct preposition after 'dedicated' is 'to', not 'with'.

× Uh, she likes umm explain English so much.

✓ She likes to explain English so much.

After 'likes', the infinitive form 'to explain' is correct rather than the base verb 'explain' alone.

× I don't uh deserve it.

✓ I don't deserve it.

The filler 'uh' is unnecessary and disrupts the sentence flow.

× And uh, when I was this uh school, I'm so was umm, sadly because this teacher don't give me umm more.

✓ And when I was at this school, I was so sad because this teacher didn't give me more.

'When I was this school' should be 'when I was at this school' (preposition error). 'I'm so was umm, sadly' is incorrect; correct past tense is 'I was so sad'. 'This teacher don't give me' should be 'this teacher didn't give me' to match past tense.

× I, I prefer to have a few rules at school because it can be more good for people's, uh, we will be, will be more different, more interesting.

✓ I prefer to have a few rules at school because it can be better for people; we will be more different and more interesting.

'More good' is incorrect; the comparative form is 'better'. Also, 'people's' is incorrect here; it should be 'people'. The sentence is restructured for clarity.

× And it's, uh, so good to students that they can do what they want with theirs.

✓ And it's so good for students that they can do what they want with theirs.

The preposition 'to' should be 'for' when referring to benefiting students. 'With theirs' is vague; contextually, it might mean 'with their own things' but is left as is due to lack of clarity.

× All teachers that I have was so strict, but it was so good strict.

✓ All teachers that I have had were so strict, but it was good strictness.

'Have was' is incorrect; it should be 'have had' to indicate past experience. 'Teachers' is plural, so verb should be 'were'. 'Good strict' is awkward; 'good strictness' or 'strict in a good way' is better.

× I think it's, uh, can be more, uh, good for people, for students that they will be, uh, more interesting with this subject.

✓ I think it can be better for students so that they will be more interested in this subject.

'It's can be' is incorrect; 'it can be' is correct. 'More interesting with this subject' should be 'more interested in this subject' to correctly express the feeling towards the subject.

× And uh, I think strict, uh, with, uh, minimum, uh, options, it's good.

✓ And I think strictness with minimum options is good.

The phrase is awkward; 'strict with minimum options' is better expressed as 'strictness with minimum options'. The preposition 'with' is acceptable here.

× Yeah, I think I will do like to workout, uh, a teacher in the real free school because, uh, I like it.

✓ Yeah, I think I would like to work as a teacher in a rule-free school because I like it.

'Will do like to workout' is incorrect. The correct modal verb phrase is 'would like to work'. 'Workout' is a noun or verb meaning exercise; 'work' is the correct verb here. 'Real free school' should be 'rule-free school'.

× I like when teachers can do what they want and explain, uh, subjects how they want.

✓ I like when teachers can do what they want and explain subjects how they want.

No preposition error here; sentence is acceptable after removing filler words.