Rules— Part 1 Report

Suggestion: Be direct and concise: start with a clear topic sentence stating whether there are rules, then give one or two specific reasons using linking words. Avoid hesitation and grammar errors (use plural/singular correctly and articles).

Example: Yes, there are many rules at my school. For example, we must wear a uniform and arrive on time; otherwise students may get into arguments or disrupt lessons. As a result, the rules help maintain order and a safe learning environment.

Suggestion: Answer directly and give a balanced opinion with reasons and one short example. Use correct grammar (few/many, singular/plural, articles) and linking words (because, therefore).

Example: I think additional sensible rules could help, because they reduce disruptive behaviour and make expectations clear. For instance, a rule about respectful communication would lower the number of conflicts among students.

Suggestion: State a clear yes/no and then describe one specific example of a dedicated teacher and what they did. Use natural phrasing and complete sentences; avoid vague statements.

Example: Yes. One of my teachers acted like a second parent: she spent extra time after class helping struggling students and regularly checked our progress, which showed how dedicated she was.

Suggestion: Give a clear preference and support it with two concise reasons using linking words (because, therefore, also). Correct vocabulary (competition, it) and grammar (more rules, prevent competition).

Example: I prefer more rules because they prevent unhealthy competition and ensure fair treatment for everyone. Also, clearer rules can improve teaching quality and the school’s overall atmosphere.

Suggestion: Be factual and avoid inappropriate or unclear details. If mentioning strictness, give a short example of strict behaviour and balance it with one note of kindness. Use past tense consistently and avoid disorganized clauses.

Example: Yes. One biology teacher was very strict: she punished late homework and enforced classroom rules firmly. However, she was also kind, as she stayed after class to help students who struggled.

Suggestion: Answer clearly and explain your reason with a specific benefit. Use clear vocabulary (rule-free, curriculum, develop) and avoid vague phrases. Limit to two sentences maximum.

Example: Yes, I would like to teach in a rule-free school because it would allow more flexibility to adapt the curriculum to students’ needs. For example, I could introduce project-based learning and adjust lessons based on student interests.

× He's in our school.

✓ He is in our class.

The student likely meant to refer to a person who attends the same class or school; 'He's in our school' is not ungrammatical but is awkward in context. Replacing 'school' with 'class' makes the reference clearer. Use 'he is' or 'he's' consistently and ensure the noun matches the intended meaning.

× There are lots of rules, uh, for the students because the if there is no rules in the school, the student will, may get trouble.

✓ There are lots of rules for the students because if there are no rules in the school, the students may get into trouble.

Multiple issues: 'there is no rules' mixes singular verb with plural noun (use 'there are no rules'); 'the student' should be plural 'the students' to match general meaning; 'will, may get trouble' is confused modal use — choose 'may get into trouble'. Use 'get into trouble' collocation.

× They will uh, fight things and lots of problem will be created.

✓ They will fight and a lot of problems will be created.

Use plural 'problems' to match 'lots of' and remove 'things' after 'fight' (people fight 'each other' or simply 'fight'). 'Lots of problem' is incorrect; use 'a lot of problems' or 'many problems'.

× Yes, umm, if there is a lots of rules in our school, it will benefit to student because if there is no rule, they will get into fighting and the problem lots of problem will be arises.

✓ Yes, if there are a lot of rules in our school, it will benefit students because if there are no rules, they will get into fighting and many problems will arise.

'There is a lots of rules' mixes singular 'is' with plural 'rules' and uses 'a lot' incorrectly; use 'there are a lot of rules'. 'Benefit to student' should be 'benefit students' (no 'to'). 'If there is no rule' should be 'if there are no rules'. 'The problem lots of problem will be arises' contains plural/singular and verb form errors: use 'many problems will arise' (present simple future sense).

× So if there was a rules, there's no issues.

✓ So if there were rules, there wouldn't be any issues.

'If there was a rules' mixes singular verb with plural noun; for hypothetical present use subjunctive 'if there were rules'. 'There's no issues' mixes singular contraction with plural noun; use 'there wouldn't be any issues'.

× Yes, the teacher is our second parent, so we have to respect and dedicated to our teacher so.

✓ Yes, the teacher is like a second parent, so we have to respect and be dedicated to our teachers.

Use of 'dedicated' is adjective and needs 'be dedicated' or 'show dedication'. 'Respect and dedicated to our teacher so' is ungrammatical: parallel verbs needed ('respect and be dedicated') and 'teachers' plural fits general statement. Also add 'like' to make the comparison natural.

× I will prefer a more rules at school because having rules it will prevent from complete between the students and also the IT will bring lots of improvement in the school that's why I will prefer more rules at school.

✓ I would prefer more rules at school because having rules will prevent competition between students and will bring many improvements to the school; that's why I prefer more rules.

'I will prefer a more rules' mixes 'a' with plural 'rules' and uses future incorrectly — use 'I would prefer' or 'I prefer'. 'Prevent from complete' is wrong; correct collocation is 'prevent competition'. 'the IT' is unclear; likely 'it' (pronoun) or remove. 'lots of improvement' should be 'many improvements'. Ensure verb forms are consistent.

× I have one teacher that says she's taught us about the biology she used to beat us.

✓ I have one teacher who taught us biology; she used to punish us physically.

Use 'who' for people, not 'that'. 'Says she's taught us about the biology' is awkward — simpler past 'taught us biology' fits context. 'Beat us' is strong; if referring to corporal punishment use 'used to punish us physically'. Also remove unnecessary article 'the' before 'biology'.

× She's very strict, but she's kind hearted person, uh.

✓ She's very strict, but she's a kind-hearted person.

Need the article 'a' before 'kind-hearted person' and use hyphenated adjective 'kind-hearted' or two-word adjective 'kind hearted' corrected. Maintain parallel description.

× Of course, yes, I like to work as a teacher in a role for rule free school because we can evolve to exchange our program level.

✓ Of course. Yes, I would like to work as a teacher in a rule-free school because we can develop and improve our curriculum.

'role for rule free school' is confused — likely 'rule-free school'. Use 'would like' for preference. 'Evolve to exchange our program level' is unclear; replace with natural collocation 'develop and improve our curriculum' or 'raise the level of our programs'. Use hyphen 'rule-free' and correct verbs 'develop/improve'.