Part 1
Examiner
Are there tall buildings near your home?
Candidate
No, because I don't live in an apartment. Blocks consist of lots of tall buildings. The street I live on is full of a terrace of two floor apartments.
Examiner
Do you take photos of buildings?
Candidate
To be honest, no, as I don't reckon myself as a person who loves taking photos. However, if I came across a building that is actually very stunning or is culturally rich, I think it might be worth capturing it using my camera.
Examiner
Is there a building that you would like to visit?
Candidate
To be honest, not particularly as I don't think I'm quite into architecture and all of the buildings around me kind of look similar to me, so I'm not really passionate about visiting a building.
Are there tall buildings near your home?
Score: 72.0Suggestion: Make the response more concise and natural by starting with a clear topic sentence, then add one specific supporting detail with a linking word. Avoid redundancy (e.g. "apartment" vs "apartment block") and correct minor phrasing issues.
Example: No, there aren’t many tall buildings near my home. Instead, the street is lined with two-storey terraced houses, so the area feels low-rise and residential.
Do you take photos of buildings?
Score: 84.0Suggestion: This answer is clear and appropriately developed, but could be more natural by using simpler phrases and one linking word. Replace informal or slightly awkward phrases (e.g. "I don't reckon myself") with more natural alternatives and shorten where possible.
Example: Not usually — I'm not really into photography. However, if I saw a building that was stunning or had cultural significance, I would definitely take a picture of it.
Is there a building that you would like to visit?
Score: 68.0Suggestion: Give a direct topic sentence, then add a concise reason and one specific example or brief contrast to enrich the answer. Avoid vague phrases like "not quite into" and "kind of look similar"; be more precise.
Example: Not really — I'm not very interested in architecture because most local buildings look similar. If I had to choose, I might visit a famous landmark abroad, like the Gaudí buildings in Barcelona, to see something truly distinctive.
× No, because I don't live in an apartment.
✓ No, I don't live in an apartment.
The original sentence used 'No, because' which creates a sentence fragment and awkward structure in response to a yes/no question. Removing 'because' yields a concise, grammatically correct reply that fits the context of answering whether there are tall buildings near the speaker's home.
× Blocks consist of lots of tall buildings.
✓ Blocks consist of many tall buildings.
'Lots of' is informal but not ungrammatical; however, 'many' is more appropriate in this context. The original is understandable but slightly awkward. Also 'Blocks consist of' is acceptable, but 'consist of many tall buildings' is clearer and more formal.
× The street I live on is full of a terrace of two floor apartments.
✓ The street I live on is lined with two-storey terraced apartments.
The original phrase 'full of a terrace of two floor apartments' is ungrammatical and awkward. Correct expression is 'two-storey' (or 'two-floor') and 'terraced apartments' describes a row of connected houses. 'Lined with' is a natural verb for describing what a street has along it.
× To be honest, no, as I don't reckon myself as a person who loves taking photos.
✓ To be honest, no, because I don't consider myself a person who likes taking photos.
'Reckon myself as' is nonstandard here; 'consider myself' is the correct verb phrase. Also 'as' after 'reckon' is unnecessary. 'Likes taking photos' is more natural than 'loves taking photos' given the negative context. This fixes verb choice and preposition usage.
× However, if I came across a building that is actually very stunning or is culturally rich, I think it might be worth capturing it using my camera.
✓ However, if I came across a building that was really stunning or culturally rich, I would think it worth capturing with my camera.
The conditional needs consistent past-subjunctive tense: 'if I came across' pairs with 'would' rather than 'might' or present 'is'. Change 'is' to 'was' and adjust the result clause to 'I would think it worth capturing' or 'I would capture it with my camera.' Also 'using my camera' is wordy; 'with my camera' is more natural.
× To be honest, not particularly as I don't think I'm quite into architecture and all of the buildings around me kind of look similar to me, so I'm not really passionate about visiting a building.
✓ To be honest, not particularly, because I don't think I'm very into architecture and the buildings around me all look quite similar, so I'm not really interested in visiting any of them.
The original contains informal fillers ('kind of', 'so') and slightly mixed word order. 'I'm quite into' is acceptable but 'very into' or 'particularly' reads better. 'All of the buildings around me kind of look similar to me' is redundant; simplify to 'the buildings around me all look quite similar.' 'Passionate about visiting a building' is awkward; 'interested in visiting any of them' is clearer and idiomatic.