Traffic— Part 1 Report

Suggestion: Your answer is generally clear but could be more natural and concise. Avoid redundancy such as "for passengers" and "for pedestrians" which mean the same here. Also, watch your sentence structure to improve fluency, for example, "cross cross through the road safely by" is awkward. Try to use linking words to connect ideas smoothly.

Example: Yes, the suburb I live in is well planned, so there are many crosswalks for pedestrians to cross the road safely. However, I believe it's the responsibility of pedestrians to use them properly.

Suggestion: Your answer addresses the question but contains some unclear phrases and grammar mistakes. For example, "color light" should be "traffic lights" and "drivers will be more confidence" should be "drivers will be more confident." Use linking words like "because" and "therefore" to make your reasoning clearer and more logical.

Example: If I could change something, it would be the number of traffic lights. Currently, there are only a few in my suburb, so I think the council should install more. This would help drivers feel more confident and improve road safety.

× Yes, the suburb I live is properly planned so there are lots of crosswalks for passengers. For pedestrians to use and cross cross through the road safely by.

✓ Yes, the suburb I live in is properly planned, so there are lots of crosswalks for pedestrians to use and cross the road safely.

The original sentence has sentence structure issues, including a missing preposition 'in' after 'live', unnecessary repetition of 'cross', and awkward phrasing 'for passengers. For pedestrians to use and cross cross through the road safely by'. The corrected sentence combines the ideas clearly and correctly, improving readability and grammatical accuracy.

× However I believe it's pedestrians responsibility to use them properly.

✓ However, I believe it's the pedestrians' responsibility to use them properly.

The phrase 'it's pedestrians responsibility' lacks the definite article 'the' and the possessive apostrophe in 'pedestrians'. The correct form is 'the pedestrians' responsibility' to indicate possession. This correction clarifies the meaning and follows standard English grammar rules.

× If I could choose something, it would be the color light.

✓ If I could choose something, it would be the traffic light.

The phrase 'color light' is incorrect; the correct term is 'traffic light'. This is a vocabulary issue related to quantifiers and word choice. Using the correct term improves clarity and correctness.

× I believe the council should properly plan the color lights in my suburb because I have seen only few places with color lights.

✓ I believe the council should properly plan the traffic lights in my suburb because I have seen only a few places with traffic lights.

The phrase 'only few places' is incorrect; it should be 'only a few places' to indicate a small number. Also, 'color lights' should be 'traffic lights'. These corrections improve grammatical accuracy and clarity.

× By increasing them, drivers will be more confidence.

✓ By increasing them, drivers will be more confident.

The word 'confidence' is a noun, but the sentence requires an adjective to describe 'drivers'. The correct adjective is 'confident'. This is a modal verb usage issue where the verb phrase needs to be followed by an adjective, not a noun.