Part 1
Examiner
Are there a lot of crosswalks around the placewhere you live?
Candidate
I believe in a suburb area that is not inside the city and uh, there is not most crosswalks because it's place simple. Uh, uh, Rd. not connected to NHR state. How is it is a road built several years ago. Uh, there is no.
Examiner
Is there anything you would like to change aboutthe traffic in your area?
Candidate
Yes, I like to make the traffic system more front and efficient. Sometimes I saw when I was going on with the the no signal at all or sometime signal is there but people are not doing. I want to make more efficient and obligatory for people to open that.
Are there a lot of crosswalks around the place where you live?
Score: 40.0Suggestion: Your answer lacks clarity and coherence. Try to respond directly to the question with a clear topic sentence, avoid filler words like 'uh', and provide specific details using linking words to make your answer more natural and effective. Also, keep your answer within 5 sentences.
Example: I live in a suburban area where there are not many crosswalks because the roads are simple and less busy. For example, the main road near my house was built several years ago and does not have many pedestrian crossings. Therefore, people usually cross the street carefully without designated crosswalks.
Is there anything you would like to change about the traffic in your area?
Score: 45.0Suggestion: Your answer needs to be clearer and more structured. Start with a direct response, then explain your reasons using linking words. Avoid grammatical errors and unclear phrases. Use specific examples to support your points and keep your answer concise.
Example: Yes, I would like to improve the traffic system in my area to make it more efficient. For instance, sometimes there are no traffic signals at busy intersections, which causes confusion. Moreover, even when signals are present, some people do not follow them properly. Therefore, I think it is important to enforce traffic rules strictly to ensure safety and smooth flow.
× there is not most crosswalks because it's place simple
✓ there are not many crosswalks because it's a simple place
The phrase 'there is not most crosswalks' is incorrect because 'crosswalks' is plural and requires 'there are' instead of 'there is'. Also, 'most' is not appropriate here; 'many' is the correct quantifier for countable plural nouns. Additionally, 'it's place simple' should be 'it's a simple place' to include the article 'a' before the singular noun 'place'.
× Uh, uh, Rd. not connected to NHR state. How is it is a road built several years ago. Uh, there is no.
✓ The road is not connected to NHR state. It was built several years ago. There is no connection.
The original sentences are fragmented and lack proper structure. 'Rd. not connected to NHR state' is incomplete; it should be a full sentence with a subject and verb. 'How is it is a road built several years ago' is grammatically incorrect and unclear; it should be 'It was built several years ago.' 'Uh, there is no.' is incomplete and needs clarification. Proper sentence structure improves clarity and coherence.
× Yes, I like to make the traffic system more front and efficient.
✓ Yes, I would like to make the traffic system more fluent and efficient.
The phrase 'I like to make' is better expressed as 'I would like to make' to indicate a desire or wish. Also, 'front' is incorrect in this context; the intended word is likely 'fluent' or 'smooth' to describe traffic flow. Modal verbs like 'would' are used to express polite desires or intentions.
× Sometimes I saw when I was going on with the the no signal at all or sometime signal is there but people are not doing.
✓ Sometimes I saw when I was going that there was no signal at all, or sometimes the signal was there but people were not following it.
The sentence mixes past and present tenses incorrectly. 'Sometimes I saw' is past tense, so the rest should also be in past tense for consistency. 'No signal at all' needs 'there was' to be grammatically correct. 'People are not doing' is vague and should be 'people were not following it' to clarify the meaning.
× I want to make more efficient and obligatory for people to open that.
✓ I want to make it more efficient and obligatory for people to follow the rules.
The sentence lacks a clear object; 'make more efficient' needs an object like 'it'. 'Obligatory for people to open that' is unclear; likely, the intended meaning is 'obligatory for people to follow the rules' or 'obligatory to obey the signals'. Pronouns and objects must be used clearly to convey meaning.