Rules— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: 回答が不明瞭で文法的な誤りが多く、意味が伝わりにくいです。具体的なルールを明確に述べ、文法を正しく使う練習をしましょう。例えば、主語と動詞の一致や適切な前置詞の使用に注意してください。

Ejemplo: When I was a student, there were several rules. For example, students were not allowed to leave the school premises during breaks without permission.

Sugerencia: 内容が曖昧で、具体的な意見や理由が不足しています。質問に対して明確な立場を示し、具体例や理由を付け加えて話を展開しましょう。

Ejemplo: I think it depends on the school. Some schools have strict rules to maintain discipline, which can help students focus better, while others are more flexible to encourage creativity.

Sugerencia: 回答は比較的明確ですが、文法の誤りや不自然な表現があります。より自然な英語表現を使い、理由や感想を具体的に述べると良いでしょう。

Ejemplo: Yes, I have. When I was a student, I had a dedicated chemistry teacher who always encouraged me. Thanks to his support, I was able to succeed at university.

Sugerencia: 意味が伝わりにくく、文法的な誤りも多いです。自分の意見をはっきり述べ、理由を簡潔に説明する練習をしましょう。

Ejemplo: I prefer fewer rules at school because I believe students should have the freedom to make their own choices as long as they do not break any laws.

Sugerencia: 回答は基本的な内容を伝えていますが、繰り返しや曖昧な表現が多いです。文を簡潔にし、具体的なエピソードを加えると良いでしょう。

Ejemplo: Yes, I had a very strict teacher in junior high school. He always assigned a large amount of homework, which was sometimes difficult to finish.

Sugerencia: 回答が不完全で意味が不明瞭です。質問に対して明確な意見を述べ、理由や状況を具体的に説明する練習をしましょう。

Ejemplo: To be honest, I think working as a teacher in a school without rules could be challenging. While it might work in highly educated schools, many students need guidance and structure.

× When I was a student, there are several rules.

✓ When I was a student, there were several rules.

The sentence refers to a past time ('When I was a student'), so the verb should be in the past tense. 'Are' is present tense and incorrect here; it should be 'were'.

× Students are prohibit and.

✓ Students are prohibited.

The verb 'prohibit' should be in the past participle form 'prohibited' to form the passive voice with 'are'. The original sentence is incomplete and grammatically incorrect.

× I'm going outside instead of coming back to their homes not to involved in.

✓ They are not allowed to go outside instead of coming back to their homes to avoid getting involved in trouble.

The original sentence is fragmented and unclear. It lacks proper subject-verb agreement and correct verb forms. The correction clarifies the meaning and corrects grammar.

× It depends on schools.

✓ It depends on the school.

The phrase 'depends on' is usually followed by a singular noun when referring to a general condition. Using 'the school' is more natural here.

× students obtain licenses of doing everything unless they are not involved in claims.

✓ students are allowed to do everything unless they are involved in claims.

The phrase 'obtain licenses of doing everything' is unnatural. 'Are allowed to do everything' is the correct expression. Also, 'unless they are not involved' is a double negative; it should be 'unless they are involved'.

× On the other hand, in another group another school rules are set.

✓ On the other hand, in another group, different school rules are set.

The original sentence is awkward and unclear. Adding commas and changing 'another school rules' to 'different school rules' improves clarity and grammar.

× Thanks to his support, I could handle university.

✓ Thanks to his support, I was able to handle university.

'Could' is often used for ability in the past, but 'was able to' is more appropriate here to express successful completion.

× I would like to join.

✓ I would like to join the university.

The sentence is incomplete and lacks an object. Adding 'the university' clarifies the meaning.

× I prefer to have less rules at school because I'd like to do everything without any rules unless I'm not involved in crimes other.

✓ I prefer to have fewer rules at school because I'd like to do everything without any rules unless I'm involved in crimes.

'Rules' is countable, so 'fewer' should be used instead of 'less'. Also, 'unless I'm not involved' is a double negative and should be 'unless I'm involved'. The phrase 'crimes other' is unclear and removed.

× I have very strict, strict teacher.

✓ I had a very strict teacher.

The sentence refers to the past, so 'have' should be 'had'. Also, 'strict' is repeated unnecessarily.

× He always asked us to do significant amount of homework.

✓ He always asked us to do a significant amount of homework.

The phrase 'significant amount' requires the article 'a' before it.

× We almost couldn't, uh.

✓ We almost couldn't finish it.

The sentence is incomplete and unclear. Adding 'finish it' completes the thought.

× Now to be honest, if I were a teacher in high educated school it would would be a benefit for me, but in many cases I have to take care for students who are not.

✓ Now, to be honest, if I were a teacher in a highly educated school, it would be a benefit for me, but in many cases, I have to take care of students who are not.

'High educated school' should be 'highly educated school' (adverb + adjective). 'Would would' is a repetition error. 'Take care for' should be 'take care of'. The sentence is also improved with commas for clarity.