Rules— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Be more concise and use a clear topic sentence, then add one specific supporting detail. Avoid repeating the same idea (order/discipline) twice and correct small word choices (e.g. 'trash' → 'litter' is fine, but say 'bring litter into the classroom').

例: Yes — we have a set of school rules to keep classrooms orderly. For example, students are not allowed to bring food wrappers or other litter into the classroom, and teachers remind us to use bins to keep the room clean.

提案: Clarify your meaning and avoid vague phrases. Start with a direct answer, then give one clear reason with a concrete example. Use correct grammar (e.g. 'compelled to obey' and 'law-abiding citizens').

例: Yes, to some extent. Clear rules can help develop self-discipline; for instance, consistent expectations about punctuality encourage students to arrive on time, which benefits their future work habits.

提案: Good structure and a specific example — improve vocabulary slightly and correct small grammar (say 'I had' rather than 'I know' if referring to the past, and 'beyond her classroom responsibilities'). Keep answers within 3–4 sentences.

例: Yes, I had a very dedicated teacher who went beyond her classroom responsibilities. For example, she ran free tutorial sessions after school to help students who were struggling with maths, which really improved our grades.

提案: Give a clear topic sentence that directly answers the preference, then support it with one specific reason and an example. Fix grammar and phrasing ('strictly followed' and 'for instance, punctuality — if everyone follows it...').

例: I prefer consistent rules rather than more or fewer rules. For instance, if the school enforces punctuality consistently, students learn to be on time, which improves lessons and reduces disruptions.

提案: Be concise and correct grammar: use past tense consistently and avoid repetition. Provide one concrete effect of strictness rather than vague claims. Replace 'low become law abiding citizen' with 'helped us become law‑abiding citizens'.

例: Yes, I had a strict university lecturer who insisted on daily routines and punctuality. Because of his rules, I became more organised and rarely missed deadlines, which helped my overall performance.

提案: Good direct answer and reason — tighten language and avoid repetition. Use correct phrasing ('rule‑free school' and 'might disrespect teachers' without 'be'). Provide one concise example of a likely problem.

例: No, I couldn't teach in a rule‑free school. For example, without clear rules about behaviour, students might talk over lessons or ignore instructions, making it hard to teach effectively.

× Yes, I believe students will benefit more from morals because they will compel to obey specially to higher authorities.

✓ Yes, I believe students will benefit more from moral education because it will compel them to obey, especially higher authorities.

The original uses 'morals' incorrectly as a quantifier and an abstract noun; 'moral education' or 'morals' treated as a concept works better. 'They will compel to obey' is ungrammatical: 'compel' requires a direct object and an infinitive ('compel them to obey'). 'specially' should be 'especially'. Use 'them' to refer to students. The revised sentence clarifies the subject and uses appropriate quantifiers and collocations.

× This will instill on the minds the value of self-discipline which generally helps them to become a law abiding citizen in the future.

✓ This will instill in their minds the value of self-discipline, which generally helps them to become law-abiding citizens in the future.

The phrase 'instill on the minds' is incorrect; standard collocation is 'instill in (someone's) mind(s)'. 'A law abiding citizen' conflicts with plural 'them'; use plural 'citizens'. Hyphenate 'law-abiding'. Commas add clarity to the relative clause. The corrected sentence fixes preposition use, number agreement and punctuation.

× Yes, I know 1 teacher who is dedicated in her chosen career.

✓ Yes, I know one teacher who is dedicated to her chosen career.

Using the numeral '1' in speech transcript is informal; spell 'one'. The verb phrase 'dedicated in' is incorrect; use 'dedicated to'. The rest remains simple present to state a general fact.

× In fact, she goes beyond the actual classroom responsibility.

✓ In fact, she goes beyond the actual classroom responsibilities.

'Responsibility' should be plural here because 'classroom responsibilities' refers to multiple duties. Alternatively, 'the actual classroom responsibility' could be singular if one specific duty is meant, but plural fits the context. 'Goes beyond' is fine.

× For instance, she offers tutorial sessions after school hours to help the struggling students in her subject.

✓ For instance, she offers tutorial sessions after school hours to help struggling students in her subject.

The definite article 'the' before 'struggling students' implies a specific group; in general statements omit 'the'. The rest is grammatically correct.

× I believe it's not about how many rules to establish in school.

✓ I believe it's not about how many rules should be established in school.

The infinitival clause 'how many rules to establish' is awkward; use a modal 'should be established' to express recommendation. This matches the speaker's evaluative stance.

× I think it is more effective if these rules are consistent and it is strictly followed by the students.

✓ I think it is more effective if these rules are consistent and are strictly followed by the students.

The subject 'these rules' is plural, so the verb should be 'are' not 'it is'. Replace 'it is strictly followed' with 'are strictly followed' to agree with the plural subject.

× For instance, punctuality if everyone is following and observing this policy.

✓ For instance, punctuality, if everyone follows and observes this policy, will improve overall attendance.

The original fragment lacks a main verb and clear structure. 'If everyone is following and observing this policy' is awkward; use 'if everyone follows and observes this policy'. Add a main clause to complete the sentence (example: 'will improve overall attendance') so the thought is complete. Adjust tense for general condition.

× Yes, I remember I had a teacher who is very strict in class when I was at the university.

✓ Yes, I remember I had a teacher who was very strict in class when I was at university.

The relative clause should match past context: 'had a teacher who was very strict' rather than 'is'. Also, 'at the university' is acceptable but 'at university' is more natural in many varieties of English; either is fine. The main correction fixes tense agreement.

× I remember he made sure that we follow the daily routines or else we'll get punished.

✓ I remember he made sure that we followed the daily routines or else we would get punished.

Reported past action ('he made sure') requires backshifting: 'we followed' (simple past) rather than 'we follow'. Similarly, 'we'll' should be 'we would' to match past tense in reported speech. This maintains tense consistency.

× I think it help us to become more disciplined and low become law abiding citizen in the future.

✓ I think it helped us to become more disciplined and to become law-abiding citizens in the future.

'I think' is present but refers to past effect; the verb should be past 'helped' to match context or change the sentence to a general statement. 'low' is a typo for 'also' or extraneous; likely intended 'also' but removed in correction. 'Become law-abiding citizens' needs plural 'citizens' and hyphenated 'law-abiding'. Add 'to' before the second verb for parallel structure.

× It is very helpful in the present life.

✓ It is very helpful in present life.

'In the present life' is awkward; more natural is 'in present life' or better 'in life today' or 'in their present lives'. Depending on meaning, use plural 'lives'. The correction simplifies phraseology for natural English.

× I don't think I can work effectively as a teacher in a rule free school.

✓ I don't think I could work effectively as a teacher in a rule-free school.

Use conditional 'could' to express hypothetical ability. 'Rule free' should be hyphenated as 'rule-free' when used as a compound adjective before a noun.

× It would be challenging to manage the classroom because there are no set rules.

✓ It would be challenging to manage the classroom because there are no set rules.

This sentence is correct; no preposition error. No correction needed. (Included to show sentence was checked.)

× For instance, students might be disrespecting teachers without thinking about the consequence because there are no rules for such behavior.

✓ For instance, students might disrespect teachers without thinking about the consequences because there are no rules for such behaviour.

'Might be disrespecting' is a continuous form less natural for habitual possibility; use simple 'might disrespect'. 'The consequence' should be plural 'the consequences' in this context. Spelling 'behaviour' can be British/Australian; kept as 'behaviour'. This improves verb choice and noun number.