Part 1
試験官
Do you like reading?
受験者
I really love reading, umm, all kinds of books, umm, I immerse myself, umm, into reading, uh, I can go for from uh, classic literature to uh, modern fiction in a row, umm, I thoroughly enjoy.
試験官
Do you prefer to read on paper or on a screen?
受験者
I always prefer to read from paper, the real on real books, not on the screen. A real book can give that, uh, experience, uh, pretty well, uh.
試験官
When do you need to read carefully, and when not?
受験者
We need to carefully read when the characters switch or the, uh, the twist will happen or on the climax areas, uh.
試験官
Do you prefer scanning or detailed reading?
受験者
I prefer, uh, detailed reading rather than scanning because it gives more intense knowledge about the character. Uh, the, some of the, uh, the, the story is storyline, uh, and uh, the scanning is not give that much intense knowledge and details, uh, the little details.
Do you like reading?
スコア: 65.0提案: Reduce hesitation and filler words, give a clear topic sentence and one or two specific supporting details. Keep it concise (max 5 sentences) and use varied vocabulary (e.g., 'classic literature', 'contemporary fiction').
例: Yes, I love reading. I enjoy a wide range of books, from classic literature to contemporary fiction, because I like exploring different writing styles and ideas. For example, I recently reread a classic novel to study its themes and then read a modern novel for its fresh perspective.
Do you prefer to read on paper or on a screen?
スコア: 70.0提案: Answer directly with a clear reason and one brief supporting example. Avoid repetition and hesitations; use linking words like 'because' to connect ideas.
例: I prefer reading on paper because physical books give me a more immersive and comfortable experience. For instance, I find it easier to concentrate and remember details when I read a paperback rather than on my phone.
When do you need to read carefully, and when not?
スコア: 60.0提案: Start with a direct topic sentence, then explain clearly with specific conditions and a brief example. Use linking words such as 'when' and 'otherwise' to structure the answer, and avoid vague phrases.
例: You should read carefully when plot twists occur or when the story reaches its climax because those parts contain important details. Otherwise, you can skim simple descriptive passages if you already understand the context.
Do you prefer scanning or detailed reading?
スコア: 62.0提案: Give a clear topic sentence with a concise reason and one concrete example. Replace hesitations with precise vocabulary ('in-depth', 'skim', 'character development') and use a linking word like 'because' or 'so'.
例: I prefer detailed reading because it allows me to understand characters and plot developments in depth. For example, by reading closely I notice subtle motivations and foreshadowing that I would miss if I only skimmed the text.
× I really love reading, umm, all kinds of books, umm, I immerse myself, umm, into reading, uh, I can go for from uh, classic literature to uh, modern fiction in a row, umm, I thoroughly enjoy.
✓ I really love reading all kinds of books; I immerse myself in reading and can go from classic literature to modern fiction in one sitting, which I thoroughly enjoy.
The original has unnecessary commas and awkward verb forms. 'Immerse myself into' should be 'immerse myself in' (preposition correction). 'Go for from' is incorrect; use 'go from'. 'In a row' is informal and unclear; 'in one sitting' is more natural. Also combine clauses with proper punctuation to avoid run-on sentences.
× I always prefer to read from paper, the real on real books, not on the screen.
✓ I always prefer to read from paper, the real physical books, not on a screen.
Problems: 'from paper' is acceptable but 'on paper' or 'from paper'—better 'read on paper' or 'read physical books'. 'the real on real books' is ungrammatical; use 'the real physical books'. Also article before 'screen' should be 'a screen' because it refers to screens in general.
× A real book can give that, uh, experience, uh, pretty well, uh.
✓ A real book can provide that experience quite well.
Replace vague filler 'give that' with 'provide that', and 'pretty well' with 'quite well' for naturalness. Also remove filler words. Pronoun 'that' is acceptable but clarity improved by rephrasing.
× We need to carefully read when the characters switch or the, uh, the twist will happen or on the climax areas, uh.
✓ We need to read carefully when the characters change, when a twist happens, or during the climax.
'Need to carefully read' should be 'need to read carefully' (adverb placement). 'Characters switch' is awkward; use 'characters change'. 'the twist will happen' mixes tenses; use present simple 'a twist happens' for general statements. 'Climax areas' is unidiomatic; use 'during the climax'.
× I prefer, uh, detailed reading rather than scanning because it gives more intense knowledge about the character.
✓ I prefer detailed reading to scanning because it gives more in-depth knowledge about the characters.
Use 'prefer X to Y' not 'prefer X rather than Y'. 'More intense knowledge' is unnatural; 'more in-depth knowledge' is better. 'Character' should be plural 'characters' if referring generally.
× Uh, the, some of the, uh, the, the story is storyline, uh, and uh, the scanning is not give that much intense knowledge and details, uh, the little details.
✓ Some parts of the story are in the storyline, and scanning does not provide as much detailed information, including small details.
Original is disfluent with fillers and incorrect verb form 'is storyline' and 'is not give'. 'Is storyline' unclear—'are part of the storyline' or 'are in the storyline'. 'Is not give' should be 'does not give' or 'does not provide'. Also restructure to clarify meaning and remove fillers.