Keys— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Be more concise and correct grammar (use present simple and plural forms). Start with a clear topic sentence, then add one specific supporting detail. Avoid redundancy.

例: No, I don't. My building provides each household with an electronic fob, so we use that to access the gate and our rooms instead of carrying multiple keys.

提案: Answer directly about keys with correct tense and phrasing. If giving contrast, use linking words (e.g., however). Be specific about frequency or situation if relevant.

例: No, I have never lost my keys. However, I have lost items like an umbrella a couple of times, so I am careful to keep keys in a designated pocket.

提案: Use correct past tense and clearer vocabulary (e.g., 'lock myself out', 'phone a roommate'). Keep to one or two sentences: state frequency, give a concise specific example and outcome, and use linking words such as 'for example' or 'so'.

例: Rarely. It has only happened twice; for example, once I left my keys in my room while taking out the trash and had to ask a roommate to let me in.

提案: Provide a brief reason for your opinion and a conditional example to support it. Use linking words like 'because' or 'however' and avoid repeating phrases.

例: It can be a good idea if you trust your neighbour because they can help in emergencies; however, I wouldn't recommend it if you don't know them well for security reasons.

× The place I'm living actually provide each household a fob so we can use a fob to access the gate and also our room.

✓ The place I'm living in actually provides each household with a fob, so we can use it to access the gate and our room.

ID:27 and ID:2 - Subject-verb agreement and third person singular: 'The place ... provide' is incorrect because the singular subject 'place' requires the verb 'provides'. Also missing preposition 'in' after 'living' and incorrect use of articles/prepositions with 'provide ... a fob' (use 'provides each household with a fob'). Finally, use a pronoun 'it' to avoid repeating 'a fob'. Suggestion: add 'in' after 'living', change 'provide' to 'provides', add 'with', and replace the repeated noun with the pronoun 'it'.

× I did lost my umbrella for a couple of time, but I never lost my keys.

✓ I lost my umbrella a couple of times, but I never lost my keys.

ID:5 - Incorrect past tense formation: 'did lost' is ungrammatical because 'did' already marks the past; the main verb should be base form ('did lose') or simply use the past form alone ('lost'). Also 'for a couple of time' is incorrect; use 'a couple of times'. Suggestion: remove 'did' and correct plural 'times'.

× It only happened a couple of times when I was trying to throw garbage through the garbage chute and I forgot my case, but luckily I had got someone inside the room to help me a lot to let me.

✓ It only happened a couple of times when I was trying to throw garbage down the chute and I forgot my case, but luckily someone in the room was able to help me get back in.

ID:5 and ID:21 and ID:11 - Past tense and passive/auxiliary misuse: 'I had got someone inside the room to help me a lot to let me' is ungrammatical. Use 'someone in the room was able to help me get back in' or 'helped me get back in'. Also 'throw garbage through the garbage chute' is awkward; use 'throw garbage down the chute'. Remove unnecessary 'a lot' and fix word order. Suggestion: simplify to clear past tense sequence and correct preposition 'down'.

× If you know each other quite well, I think it's probably a good idea, but otherwise it's not a good idea.

✓ If you know each other quite well, I think it's probably a good idea; otherwise, it's not.

ID:6 and ID:26 - Present tense/modal clarity and sentence structure: The original is understandable but repetitive ('it's not a good idea' repeated). Use a concise contrastive structure. Tense is fine (present simple for general condition). Suggestion: shorten the second clause to avoid repetition and improve fluency.