Part 1
試験官
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
受験者
I, when I was a kid, I was around 5 years old. That was, I remember that was my 7th birthday. I, I'm sorry, that was my 5th birthday and that's when, when I asked for my dad to give me a bike, you know, and he kind of resisted in the beginning, but then.
試験官
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
受験者
The country where I'm from actually, it's a very congested city, you know, so obviously they're driving cars and that city is very difficult. So having bikes is basically a source of convenience. And obviously in a congested environment you can always utilize bikes to travel from one point to other points. So in conclusion, yeah, it is a very useful, especially when you're traveling in long distances with within the city and obviously.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
スコア: 52.0提案: Be concise and start with a clear topic sentence that directly answers the question (e.g., “Yes, I did”). Avoid hesitations and self-corrections. Then add one or two specific supporting details using linking words (for example, “because” or “and”). Keep the whole answer to no more than 3–4 sentences and be careful with factual consistency (don’t mention two different birthdays).
例: Yes, I did. I got my first bike when I was five for my birthday, and my father was reluctant at first because he worried about my safety. However, he agreed after I promised to wear a helmet, and I used that bike to ride around our neighborhood every weekend.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
スコア: 66.0提案: Begin with a direct opinion (e.g., “Yes, bikes are quite popular in my city”). Use clear linking words to structure supporting reasons (for example, “because” and “for instance”). Be specific about how bikes are used and avoid vague or contradictory statements (e.g., ‘useful for long distances’ in a congested city is odd). Limit to 3–4 sentences and use more precise vocabulary (e.g., ‘commuting’, ‘short trips’, ‘traffic congestion’).
例: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my city because traffic congestion makes driving slow and expensive. For short commutes and errands, many people prefer bicycles since they are faster and cheaper than cars. For example, commuters often use bikes to travel across busy neighborhoods where buses and cars get stuck in traffic.
× I, when I was a kid, I was around 5 years old.
✓ When I was a kid, I was around 5 years old.
The original sentence repeats the subject 'I' unnecessarily, causing clumsy structure. Remove the extra 'I' at the front so there is a single clear subject. Suggestion: start with the time phrase 'When I was a kid' followed by the main clause.
× That was, I remember that was my 7th birthday.
✓ I remember that was my 7th birthday.
The speaker mixes an introductory 'That was' with 'I remember' producing redundancy. Use the past tense memory verb 'remember' plus the past clause: 'I remember that it was my 7th birthday.' This keeps tense consistent and clear.
× I, I'm sorry, that was my 5th birthday and that's when, when I asked for my dad to give me a bike, you know, and he kind of resisted in the beginning, but then.
✓ I'm sorry, that was my 5th birthday, and that's when I asked my dad to give me a bike; he resisted at first but later agreed.
Multiple errors: tense and wordiness make the sentence awkward. Use past simple for past events ('asked', 'resisted') and simplify verb phrases ('asked my dad' instead of 'asked for my dad to give me'). Replace 'in the beginning' with 'at first' for natural phrasing, and finish with a clear result 'but later agreed.' Keep clauses concise and maintain past tense consistency.
× The country where I'm from actually, it's a very congested city, you know, so obviously they're driving cars and that city is very difficult.
✓ The city where I'm from is very congested, so people mainly drive cars and traffic is very heavy.
Mixes 'country' and 'city' and uses 'they're' ambiguously. Clarify the subject: if speaking about a city, say 'The city where I'm from.' Use 'people' instead of 'they're' to refer to drivers, and replace 'that city is very difficult' with 'traffic is very heavy' for natural English. Maintain present simple for general facts.
× So having bikes is basically a source of convenience.
✓ So having bikes is basically a convenient option.
'A source of convenience' is awkward here; use the adjective 'convenient' with 'option' or 'transport' for natural phrasing. This corrects prepositional and collocation awkwardness.
× And obviously in a congested environment you can always utilize bikes to travel from one point to other points.
✓ In a congested environment you can use bikes to travel from one point to another.
Incorrect phrase 'from one point to other points' should be 'from one point to another.' Also 'utilize' is formal; 'use' is more natural. Fixes preposition and determiners for clarity.
× So in conclusion, yeah, it is a very useful, especially when you're traveling in long distances with within the city and obviously.
✓ In conclusion, yes, bikes are very useful, especially when you're traveling long distances within the city.
Sentence is fragmented and contains extra words ('with', 'obviously') and incorrect article use ('in long distances'). Use plural 'distances' without 'in' or say 'long distances' and place 'within the city' correctly. Remove redundant fillers and ensure a complete, grammatical sentence.