Traffic— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Your answer is unclear and contains grammatical errors. Try to respond directly with a clear topic sentence, followed by specific details. Use correct vocabulary such as 'crosswalks' instead of 'cross folks' and avoid filler phrases like 'I no idea'. Keep your answer concise and natural.

例: Yes, there are many crosswalks around where I live. They are quite common and help pedestrians cross the streets safely.

提案: Your answer addresses the question but is grammatically incorrect and a bit unclear. Use linking words to connect ideas and be more specific. For example, explain why you want more crosswalks and how it would help pedestrians. Keep sentences clear and avoid redundancy.

例: I would like to improve both the quality and number of crosswalks in my area because currently, there are not enough for pedestrians. This change would make it safer for people to cross the streets and reduce accidents.

× Yes, they are cross folks in.

✓ Yes, there are crosswalks.

The original sentence incorrectly uses 'they are cross folks in' which is unclear and incorrect. The correct pronoun and phrase is 'there are crosswalks' to indicate existence of crosswalks. 'They' is a subject pronoun referring to people or things already mentioned, but here the sentence needs an existential 'there' to indicate presence.

× In the place I leave is very common that there are a lot of crosswalks to a.

✓ In the place I live, it is very common to have a lot of crosswalks.

The original sentence misuses 'leave' instead of 'live' and has awkward preposition and structure. 'In the place I live' is correct. Also, 'to a' is incorrect and unnecessary. The sentence should express that having many crosswalks is common, so 'it is very common to have a lot of crosswalks' is correct.

× I no idea.

✓ I have no idea.

The original sentence lacks a verb, making it incomplete. 'I no idea' is incorrect; the correct form is 'I have no idea' to express lack of knowledge.

× I would like to change a quality and quantity of crosswalks that there is no enough crosswalks to walk for pedestrians and I want to save pedestrians life among the crosswalks.

✓ I would like to change the quality and quantity of crosswalks because there are not enough crosswalks for pedestrians to walk safely, and I want to save pedestrians' lives at the crosswalks.

The original sentence has several issues: 'a quality and quantity' should be 'the quality and quantity' as specific aspects are referred to; 'there is no enough crosswalks' is incorrect because 'crosswalks' is plural and 'enough' should not be preceded by 'no'; correct form is 'there are not enough crosswalks'; 'to walk for pedestrians' is awkward, better 'for pedestrians to walk safely'; 'pedestrians life' should be plural possessive 'pedestrians' lives'; 'among the crosswalks' is better as 'at the crosswalks' to indicate location. The corrected sentence improves clarity and grammar.