Reading— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Be more concise and grammatical: give a clear topic sentence then one or two specific supporting details. Avoid repetition and filler sounds. Use correct tense (e.g., 'I have liked reading since I was a child') and singular/plural forms. Link ideas with a brief reason or example.

예시: Yes, I enjoy reading. I have liked books since I was a child, especially novels about animals, because they taught me about different creatures and made stories more vivid.

제안: Give a direct preference first, then support it with clear reasons. Use precise vocabulary (paper, screen) and avoid unclear phrases. Keep the answer to 2–3 sentences and use linking words like 'however' or 'because'.

예시: I prefer reading on paper because it’s easier on my eyes and helps me concentrate. However, I sometimes read on a screen for convenience when I’m traveling.

제안: Start with a clear topic sentence answering both parts: when careful reading is needed and when skimming is fine. Provide specific examples (e.g., studying, legal documents vs. news headlines) and use simple linking words like 'when' and 'but'. Avoid unclear words and fragments.

예시: I need to read carefully when I study for exams or sign legal documents because details matter. But I don’t read carefully when I’m browsing news headlines or social media, where a quick scan is enough.

제안: Give a clear opinion then support it with specific reasons and examples. Remove hesitations and correct grammar (use 'to understand' and clearer phrases like 'ideas about people'). Keep it within 2–3 sentences and use linking words such as 'because' or 'so'.

예시: I prefer detailed reading because it helps me fully understand the author’s ideas. For example, when I read biographies I learn a lot about people’s motivations and life lessons.

× Yes, definitely I am.

✓ Yes, definitely.

The student used the pronoun 'I am' redundantly after 'Yes, definitely.' The response should be a short answer; 'I am' is unnecessary and ungrammatical here in context. Use concise short answers like 'Yes, definitely.' or 'Yes, I do.'

× I am a reading person.

✓ I am a reader.

'Reading person' is an awkward adjective-noun combination. 'Reader' is the correct noun to describe someone who reads. Using the noun form makes the sentence natural and grammatically correct.

× I very, very like reading books when I was a child.

✓ I liked reading books a lot when I was a child.

The phrase 'I very, very like' is incorrect: 'like' does not combine with 'very' in this way. The sentence refers to the past, so past tense 'liked' should be used. Use 'a lot' or 'very much' to intensify likes in the past: 'I liked reading books a lot when I was a child.'

× I like to reading, I like to reading, uh, novels, for example, about animals, uh, in addition, I also read.

✓ I like reading novels, for example about animals. In addition, I also read other kinds of books.

After 'like' the gerund 'reading' is correct, not the infinitive 'to reading.' Repetition is unnecessary. Break into clear sentences and add a clarifying phrase for 'also read.' Use gerund: 'I like reading.'

× I think it doesn't have different, uh, on purpose or on a cigarette.

✓ I don't think there's much difference between reading on paper and on a screen.

The original sentence is unclear and uses incorrect words ('on purpose', 'on a cigarette'). Use the common expression 'difference between A and B' and 'reading on paper and on a screen.' Also use 'there is' construction for existence.

× They also can make me feel relaxed and learning new things.

✓ They can also make me feel relaxed and help me learn new things.

'Make me feel relaxed and learning new things' mixes structures. Use parallel verb forms: 'make me feel relaxed' and 'help me learn new things.' Also place 'also' in a natural position.

× But if you exactly want to difference, I think it's just about.

✓ But if you really want to know the difference, I think it's minor.

The phrase 'exactly want to difference' is ungrammatical. Use 'really want to know the difference.' 'It's just about' is incomplete; 'it's minor' or 'it's a matter of preference' completes the idea.

× Definitely, I think to ridicule play is important things.

✓ Definitely, I think careful reading is important.

The original is unintelligible: 'to ridicule play' and 'important things' are incorrect. Based on context, the student means 'reading carefully' or 'careful reading.' Use noun phrase 'careful reading' and agree number: 'is important.'

× It can make me make you feel serious.

✓ It can make me feel serious.

The phrase 'make me make you feel serious' is ungrammatical and confusing. Probably the student intended 'make me feel serious.' Remove the extra 'make you' and use the correct object pronoun 'me.'

× Read carefully.

✓ You should read carefully.

As an answer to 'When do you need to read carefully, and when not?' a full response should use a subject and modal or auxiliary: 'You should read carefully' or 'I need to read carefully when...' The imperative 'Read carefully' is short but incomplete as personal explanation.

× It's not how. This negatively.

✓ It's not casual; it should be done carefully.

Original fragments 'It's not how.' and 'This negatively.' are ungrammatical. Clarify by explaining: 'It's not casual; it should be done carefully.' This completes the idea and uses correct structure.

× I prefer detailed reading because, uh, you need to. Carefully understand the book, you can learn a lot of new things or for example the idea about make people.

✓ I prefer detailed reading because you need to carefully understand the book; you can learn a lot of new things, for example ideas about people.

Use gerund 'detailed reading' is fine. 'You need to. Carefully understand' should be combined as 'you need to carefully understand.' Keep parallel sentence structure and correct 'the idea about make people' to 'ideas about people.' Also use punctuation to join clauses.