Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 回答过于简短，未直接展开或给出原因和细节。建议在开头用一句完整的主题句回答问题，然后用1–2句补充细节（例如为什么没有、是否有替代交通工具或相关回忆），并用连接词衔接，使回答自然流畅。注意句子不要超过5句。

예시: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. My family couldn’t afford one at the time, so I usually walked to school or took the bus. Looking back, I sometimes wished I had a bike because other kids seemed to enjoy more freedom.

제안: 回答过于简短且缺乏具体细节或例子。建议先用一句完整的主题句直接回答，然后用1–2句具体说明原因、举例或比较（例如在城市与乡村的普及程度、骑行目的或政府政策），并用连接词连接观点与细节。保持自然用词，句子不宜过长。

예시: Yes, I think bikes are quite popular in my country. In many cities people use them for short trips or commuting because they are cheap and convenient, and recent bike-share programs have made cycling even more common.

× No.

✓ No.

该句为对过去经历的简短回答，语法正确且符合语境（回答“Did you have a bike when you were a child?”时使用过去时的简短否定回答“No.”是自然且恰当的）。无需修改。

× Yes.

✓ Yes.

该句为对一般现在时问题的简短肯定回答，语法正确且符合语境（回答“Do you think bikes are popular in your country?”时使用一般现在时的简短肯定回答“Yes.”是自然且恰当的）。无需修改。