Number— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 回答は内容がやや冗長で、文法的な誤りもあります。より自然で効果的な表現にするために、文法の正確さを意識し、冗長な部分を省き、具体的な例を簡潔に述べる練習をしましょう。

예시: Yes, I am good at remembering numbers because, as a journalist, I often need to recall car and phone numbers. For example, I can quickly recognize the occupants of a politician's car by its number plate.

제안: 文法の誤りが多く、意味が伝わりにくい部分があります。より明確で論理的な回答を心がけ、接続詞を使って文をつなげる練習をしましょう。具体的な内容ももう少し詳しく述べると良いです。

예시: Yes, I will use many numbers in my future work because I have experience working at agencies that handle statistics and company profits. Therefore, I expect to work with such data regularly.

제안: 回答は直接的で分かりやすいですが、文法の誤りと少し不自然な表現があります。接続詞を使って文をつなげ、より自然な英語表現を練習しましょう。

예시: No, I did not enjoy studying math as a child because I was more interested in sports and arts like literature and social studies. Even now, I find it difficult to work with numbers and dislike statistics.

제안: 回答が少し混乱していて、情報が整理されていません。話の流れを明確にし、文法を正しく使い、具体的な説明を簡潔に述べる練習をしましょう。

예시: My favorite number is 6 because when I was in junior high school, I played baseball and my position number was 6. Although my uniform number was 2, I always choose lockers labeled with the number 6 when possible.

× Yes, I'm confident that I'm a good at remembering how many numbers, because as a journalist I have to remember a lot of numbers, such as car numbers or phone numbers, for example.

✓ Yes, I'm confident that I'm good at remembering many numbers, because as a journalist I have to remember a lot of numbers, such as car numbers or phone numbers, for example.

The phrase 'a good at remembering how many numbers' is incorrect. 'Good' should not be preceded by 'a' here, and 'how many numbers' is awkward; 'many numbers' is more appropriate. The quantifier 'many' correctly modifies countable nouns like 'numbers'.

× I can understand who was on the politician's car at first glance.

✓ I can understand who was in the politician's car at first glance.

The preposition 'on' is incorrect when referring to people inside a car; 'in' is the correct preposition. This is a preposition error, but since 'Incorrect use of prepositions' is problem type 11, and 'Verb in the past participle form' is 9, the correction fits better under preposition error. However, as per instructions, only correct mistakes that meet the listed types. Since preposition error is type 11, this correction is under that type.

× I can understand who was on the politician's car at first glance.

✓ I can understand who was in the politician's car at first glance.

The preposition 'on' is incorrect when referring to people inside a car; 'in' is the correct preposition.

× Yes, it seems that I would use so many numbers in the future because I worked at neutral agencies and that handle how many numbers such as statistics or the profit of the company and so I will use such numbers in the near future.

✓ Yes, it seems that I will use many numbers in the future because I work at neutral agencies that handle many numbers such as statistics or the profit of the company, so I will use such numbers in the near future.

The modal verb 'would' is incorrectly used here; 'will' is appropriate for future certainty. Also, 'worked' should be 'work' to match present tense. 'That handle how many numbers' is incorrect; 'that handle many numbers' is correct. The sentence also has tense inconsistency and quantifier misuse.

× Yes, it seems that I would use so many numbers in the future because I worked at neutral agencies and that handle how many numbers such as statistics or the profit of the company and so I will use such numbers in the near future.

✓ Yes, it seems that I will use many numbers in the future because I work at neutral agencies that handle many numbers such as statistics or the profit of the company, so I will use such numbers in the near future.

The verb 'worked' is in past tense but the context requires present tense 'work' because the student is currently employed there.

× Yes, it seems that I would use so many numbers in the future because I worked at neutral agencies and that handle how many numbers such as statistics or the profit of the company and so I will use such numbers in the near future.

✓ Yes, it seems that I will use many numbers in the future because I work at neutral agencies that handle many numbers such as statistics or the profit of the company, so I will use such numbers in the near future.

The phrase 'and that handle how many numbers' is incorrect; it should be 'that handle many numbers'. The preposition 'at' in 'worked at neutral agencies' is correct but tense needs correction.

× No, I was not good at learning mathematics because I was interested in doing sports and art subjects like literature and the social studies.

✓ No, I was not good at learning mathematics because I was interested in doing sports and art subjects like literature and social studies.

The phrase 'the social studies' is incorrect; 'social studies' is an uncountable noun and does not need 'the'. This is an article error (type 22), but also relates to adjective use. The sentence is otherwise correct in past tense.

× And even now I'm not good at handling what the numbers.

✓ And even now I'm not good at handling numbers.

The phrase 'handling what the numbers' is incorrect. 'Handling numbers' is correct. The word 'what' is unnecessary and incorrect here.

× I hate statistics.

✓ I hate statistics.

No grammatical error in this sentence.

× My favorite number is 6 because when I was a junior high school student I played baseball and my position number was 6 and my uniform number was that number is 2.

✓ My favorite number is 6 because when I was a junior high school student I played baseball; my position number was 6 and my uniform number was 2.

The phrase 'my uniform number was that number is 2' is incorrect and confusing. It should be 'my uniform number was 2'. This corrects singular/plural and sentence structure errors.

× So when I go to many places and I have to use a locker, I always choose A6 locals.

✓ So when I go to many places and I have to use a locker, I always choose A6 lockers.

The word 'locals' is incorrect here; it should be 'lockers'. This is a vocabulary error but relates to incorrect noun usage.