Road— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: ปรับปรุงความถูกต้องของไวยากรณ์และการใช้ tense (พูดในปัจจุบันสำหรับสภาพปัจจุบัน) รวมถึงความชัดเจนและความกระชับ: เริ่มด้วยประโยคตอบตรง เช่น "No, they are not busy." แล้วตามด้วยเหตุผลและตัวอย่างสั้นๆ โดยใช้ linking words เช่น "because" หรือ "so" และหลีกเลี่ยงคำซ้ำซ้อน เช่น "as as" หรือ "places to places".

예시: No, the roads where I live are not busy because I live in the countryside. As a result, it’s usually easy and quick to get from one place to another by car.

제안: ปรับคำศัพท์และความชัดเจน: ใช้คำที่ถูกต้อง เช่น "walk" หรือ "cross" แทน "crawl" และหลีกเลี่ยงคำเติมเสียง "like" ซ้ำๆ ตอบตรงแล้วอธิบายเพิ่มเติมด้วยเหตุผลหรือพฤติกรรมที่สังเกตเห็นโดยใช้ linking words เช่น "usually" หรือ "often".

예시: Yes, people often cross the road on foot, and drivers usually stop to let them pass. In busy areas you sometimes see pedestrians crossing at informal points rather than at pedestrian crossings.

제안: ปรับความแม่นยำของโครงสร้างประโยคและการใช้คำให้เป็นธรรมชาติ: เริ่มด้วยประโยคสั้นๆ สรุปสภาพโดยรวม จากนั้นให้รายละเอียดเฉพาะ เช่น "potholes, dust, overgrown vegetation" ใช้ linking words เช่น "however" หรือ "but" และเสนอข้อเสนอแนะสั้นๆ หากต้องการ.

예시: Some roads are in good condition, but many are poorly maintained with dust, leaves and overgrown grass. Because of this, pedestrians sometimes find it difficult to walk safely, so local authorities should organize regular cleaning and repairs.

제안: ปรับความชัดเจนและการเรียงลำดับความคิด: ตอบตรง (Yes/No) แล้วอธิบายเหตุผลที่เป็นรูปธรรม เช่น "improve sidewalks, fix potholes, better signage" ใช้โครงสร้างประโยคที่สมบูรณ์และหลีกเลี่ยงคำซ้ำซ้อนหรือเติมคำไม่จำเป็น เช่น "like" และ "we will not like tripped over" ควรใช้ "won’t trip" หรือ "won’t stumble".

예시: Yes, I do. Improving the roads — for example fixing potholes and repairing sidewalks — would make walking and taking the bus much safer and more convenient, and reduce the risk of people tripping.

× No, I lived in a countryside, therefore it was in it isn't like busy as as it should be.

✓ No, I live in the countryside, so it isn't as busy as it should be.

The phrase 'a countryside' is incorrect; 'countryside' is uncountable and takes no article. 'Lived' (past) conflicts with present context — use present 'live'. The comparative structure 'isn't like busy as as it should be' is ungrammatical; correct form is 'isn't as busy as it should be'. Suggestion: use 'I live in the countryside' and the comparative pattern 'not as + adjective + as'.

× So it's really easy to travel places to places.

✓ So it's really easy to travel from place to place.

The phrase 'places to places' and repetition is incorrect. The idiomatic expression is 'from place to place' meaning moving between locations. Also ensure preposition 'from' is included. Suggestion: use set phrase 'from place to place'.

× Yes, they always crawl across road and a car would like stop for them for making like making them like crossing Rd. and it's really like a row so of a city that you have to do it.

✓ Yes, they always cross the road and cars stop for them to help them cross, because it's a crowded city and you have to do it.

Multiple issues: 'crawl across road' is wrong verb choice — use 'cross the road'. Missing articles: 'across road' -> 'across the road'. 'a car would like stop' is ungrammatical modal/modal-like phrasing; use simple present 'cars stop'. Redundant filler words 'like' and 'making' should be removed. 'Crossing Rd.' should be 'cross'. 'a row so of a city' is unclear; likely 'a crowded city' fits context. Use consistent present simple tense for habitual actions. Suggestion: simplify to clear subject-verb phrases and remove fillers.

× Well, part of them are in a good condition, but most of them are full of dust, full of like grass, full of leaves.

✓ Well, some of them are in good condition, but most of them are full of dust, grass, and leaves.

'Part of them are' is acceptable but 'some of them' is more natural. 'in a good condition' should be 'in good condition' (no article). Repeated 'full of like' includes filler 'like' which is inappropriate. Use parallel list with commas and 'and'. Suggestion: remove filler words and unnecessary articles.

× So it should be clean, honestly. And I think that it's our duties to do it.

✓ So they should be cleaned, honestly. And I think it is our duty to do it.

'So it should be clean' has agreement issues: 'them' (roads) are plural, so passive 'should be cleaned' fits. 'it's our duties' mixes singular 'it' with plural 'duties'; use 'it is our duty' or 'they are our duties'. Better: 'it is our duty' (singular concept). Suggestion: match number and use appropriate passive for actions performed on roads.

× Definitely if you if we improved our Rd. it would facilitate the the path walk and it make it easier for people to cross the road or to like TRA travel by bus and we'll we will not like tripped over.

✓ Definitely, if we improved our roads, it would make walking paths better and make it easier for people to cross the road or to travel by bus, and we would not trip over obstacles.

Multiple issues: 'if we improved' (conditional) pairs with 'it would' — keep that. 'our Rd.' should be 'our roads' (plural). 'facilitate the the path walk' is ungrammatical; use 'make walking paths better' or 'improve pedestrian paths'. 'it make' should be 'it would make'. Remove filler 'like' and 'TRA'. 'we'll we will not like tripped over' is incorrect; correct modal in conditional is 'we would not trip over'. Suggestion: simplify clauses, maintain conditional structure (if + past, would + base verb), and remove fillers.