Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Improve grammar, accuracy and clarity. Start with a clear topic sentence, correct verb forms and articles, and avoid irrelevant words. Keep it concise (max 5 sentences). Use simple linking words (e.g., “so”, “to”, “because”) and give one specific example. For instance, correct mistakes: use past continuous/simple past appropriately, say “I had a bike” instead of “one bite”, and use adjectives/adverbs correctly (quietly → quite, or very convenient).

Ví dụ: Yes, I had a bicycle when I was a child. I used it to ride to the nearby market or supermarket because it was very convenient and faster than walking. For example, I often rode it every Saturday to buy vegetables with my mother. So, it was useful for short trips around my neighborhood.

Gợi ý: Make your answer clearer and more accurate. Begin with a direct opinion sentence, then give 1–2 specific reasons using correct grammar and linking words (e.g., “because”, “for example”, “therefore”). Correct vocabulary errors (e.g., “bike lanes”, not “bicycle limbs”) and avoid repeating the same point. Provide a concise example or consequence to support your view.

Ví dụ: Personally, I don’t think bicycles are very popular in my country. This is because cities like Bangkok have few bike lanes and heavy traffic, so cycling can be unsafe. For example, many people prefer motorbikes or cars for daily travel, therefore cycling is mainly for recreation rather than commuting.

× I used to have one bite when I were shined.

✓ I used to have one bike when I was a child.

The sentence contains multiple errors: 'bite' is a typo for 'bike' (wrong word), and 'were shined' is incorrect. 'Were shined' attempts passive but the intended meaning is 'when I was a child' which requires the past tense of 'to be' (was) plus the noun 'child'. This fits the past participle / wrong verb form category because 'were shined' uses incorrect verb form and structure. Suggestion: use 'was' for first-person singular in past simple and replace the phrase with 'a child' to express age.

× I used the bike to go to supermarkets or the market with a short distance because it's very quite convenient.

✓ I used the bike to go to the supermarket or nearby shops because it was very convenient.

Problems: 'supermarkets or the market with a short distance' is unnatural and awkward; 'it's very quite convenient' mixes present contraction 'it's' with 'used' (past) and uses redundant modifiers 'very quite'. The tense should remain past ('used' ... 'was'). Suggest replacing the phrase with 'the supermarket or nearby shops' and use 'was very convenient'. Remove redundant adverbs; use either 'very' or 'quite' but not both.

× Well personally I think that the BI bikes are not popular in my country because in Bangkok city, Thailand it's not have the bicycle limbs.

✓ Well, personally I think that bikes are not popular in my country because Bangkok city, Thailand, does not have bicycle lanes.

Errors: 'the BI bikes' is unclear — likely meant 'bikes'; 'it's not have' is incorrect verb and pronoun use: 'it' with 'does not have' or refer to 'Bangkok' requires 'does not have'. Also 'bicycle limbs' is wrong word choice for 'bicycle lanes'. This falls under incorrect pronoun use and general word choice. Suggest using 'does not have' for singular subject and the noun 'bicycle lanes'.

× So because of their safety reasons the bikes are not popular in my country.

✓ So, because of safety reasons, bikes are not popular in my country.

Problems: 'their safety reasons' is awkward and unnecessary possessive; 'so because' is redundant (use either 'so' or 'because'). This is a sentence structure issue. Suggest simplifying to 'because of safety reasons' or 'for safety reasons' and remove 'their'. Also keep plural 'bikes' consistent.