Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Your answer is direct and clear, which is good. To improve, add one or two brief supporting details using a linking word to make it more natural and informative (for example, explain why you didn’t have a bike or what you did instead). Keep the response concise (no more than 3–4 sentences).

Ví dụ: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because my family lived in a small apartment and we didn't have space to store one. Instead, I usually walked to school or took public transport, which was quite common in my neighborhood.

Gợi ý: Your answer communicates the main idea but contains many errors (wrong words, unclear phrases, repetition) and lacks coherence. To improve: 1) Use the correct vocabulary (bikes, not bags; affordable, not ‘a fraud’; environment, not ‘provide the environment’). 2) Organize points with linking words (For example, 'Firstly...' or 'Also...'). 3) Provide specific supporting details (who rides bikes, reasons for popularity). Limit to 3–4 concise sentences and avoid filler words.

Ví dụ: Yes, I think bikes are quite popular in my country. Firstly, they are more affordable than cars, so many people use them for short trips. Also, cycling is seen as healthy and environmentally friendly, so many young people ride bikes for exercise and commuting.

× Yes, I think the bags are popular in my country as it's more a fraud, affordable than cars.

✓ Yes, I think bikes are popular in my country because they are more practical and affordable than cars.

The student used 'bags' and 'a fraud' and mixed pronouns incorrectly. 'Bags' is a wrong noun (should be 'bikes'); 'it's' (it is) incorrectly refers to bikes (plural) so plural pronoun 'they' should be used. The phrase 'a fraud' is incorrect and likely a mischoice for 'practical'. Also comparative structure needs adjective 'more practical and affordable than cars.' Suggestion: use the correct noun 'bikes', match pronoun number with noun (they for bikes), and choose appropriate adjectives ('practical').

× And also it can help us to provide the environment.

✓ Also, they can help us protect the environment.

'It' refers to bikes (plural) so should be 'they'. The verb phrase 'help us to provide the environment' is ungrammatical and wrong collocation; use 'help us protect the environment' or 'improve the environment.' Suggestion: match pronoun number and use correct verb collocation 'protect the environment.'

× Uh, a lot of young people like to use Spike as a new exercise method.

✓ A lot of young people like to use biking as a new exercise method.

'Spike' is likely a wrong word choice or mispronunciation; context indicates 'bike' or 'cycling.' The sentence structure is otherwise acceptable but must use correct noun 'biking' or 'cycling.' Suggestion: replace 'Spike' with 'biking' or 'cycling' to convey the intended meaning.

× Uh, 'cause we can always grab, grab a bag like.

✓ 'Cause we can always grab a bike and go.

Again 'bag' is incorrect; should be 'bike'. The fragment 'grab, grab a bag like' is ungrammatical and incomplete. Use a complete clause: 'we can always grab a bike and go.' Suggestion: use the correct noun and finish the thought with a verb phrase ('and go').